Legal Opinion
County of Butte v. Bach
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1985No. Civ. 23325PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, J.
These consolidated appeals arise out of an action concerning the disputed use of a house in a residential zone as a law office. The action commenced with a zoning violation complaint by the County of Butte seeking to enjoin John N. Bach, an attorney, from so using the house. Bach and his spouse, who own the property, cross-complained for damages alleging that the zoning ordinance and its enforcement were violations of their federal civil rights. The Bachs named as cross-defendants the Board of Supervisors of Butte County, Supervisor Hilda Wheeler, the office of the county…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Scott v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bach v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Breneric Associates v. City of Del MarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ewing v. City of Carmel-By-The-SeaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Alameda County Management Employees Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.