Legal Opinion

Wolff v. Fallon

California Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1955No. S. F. 18827PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiff, owner of a vacant lot in San Francisco, obtained a judgment quieting title and declaring *696that building restrictions imposed on her property by the original subdivider are no longer binding, with the exception of a 15-foot setback line to which she agreed. Defendants, who are property owners in Ingleside Terraces, the tract in which the lot is located, appeal from the judgment.

When the subdivision was created in 1913, about 20 lots in each of two separate areas were left unrestricted, and approximately 740 lots were set aside for residential purposes. The original deeds to all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hurd v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hess v. Country Club ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Downs v. KroegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Cortese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. County of Butte v. BachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Mason v. FarmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Atlas Terminals, Inc. v. SokolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API