Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hsu v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1966No. Civ. 22854PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing the action for their failure to bring it to trial within the time required under Code of Civil Procedure, section 583.

The instant action was commenced on October 6, 1959, when plaintiffs Edward Hsu, Jr., Lillian Hsu and Edward Hsu filed a complaint to recover damages for false imprisonment, assault and battery. The complaint named as defendants the City and County of San Francisco (hereafter referred to as “city”), and a number of the employees of city alleged to have acted within the scope of their employment. The tortious conduct complained of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Corning Hospital District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Brunzell Construction Co. v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Diverco Constructors, Inc. v. WilsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Dowling v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API