Legal Opinion

Dowling v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 2012No. B228899PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Rhonda Dowling, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, appeals the dismissal of her class action and individual *688complaint against Fanners Insurance Exchange (Farmers). The trial court concluded that the five-year period to bring the action to trial (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.310) expired on June 17, 2010, pursuant to the parties’ written stipulation. The court therefore granted Farmers’s motion to dismiss the class action allegations and later dismissed the entire action. Plaintiffs contend the court’s interpretation of the stipulation was erroneous and the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. DelgadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Blackwell v. VasilasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Munoz v. City of TracyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Tanguilig v. Neiman Marcus Grp., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. A&B Market Plus, Inc. v. Arabo CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API