Legal Opinion

McDonough Power Equipment Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1972No. L.A. 29992PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

Petitioner McDonough Power Equipment Co. seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent superior court to dismiss a pending action for lack of prosecution pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure1 section 583, subdivision (b), because it was not brought to trial within three years after the filing of the remittitur on a previous appeal. We have concluded that the writ should issue.

Following is a chronology of the pertinent procedural events: On June 4, 1965, real party in interest Mary Grasso (hereafter plaintiff) commenced against petitioner McDonough Power Equipment Co.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hocharian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API