Legal Opinion

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Crim

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1929No. 6 Div. 236PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The sole question presented on this record is whether there is any evidence to sustain the finding and conclusion of the circuit court that Crim was an employé within the scope and meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Code 1923, § 7534 et seq.).

The evidence is without conflict that Crim was first employed by the defendant in January, 1928, to do various kinds of work, for which he was paid a daily wage. This employment continued until about April 15th, when he entered into an agreement with the defendant’s superintendent to engage in the work of cleaning up and putting into condition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Ex Parte W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Woodward Iron Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Crescent Coal Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Martin v. Republic Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Baggett Transp. Co. v. HolderfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Hamilton Motor Co. v. CoonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API