Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The question of controlling importance in this case is whether the plaintiff at the time of his injury was riding in the defendant’s truck by invitation merely, or whether he was an employé of defendant and was riding in the truck in the course of his employment and service.
Counsel for plaintiff conceive and insist that, because he was a “vocational student,” serving without pay, and for- the purpose solely of learning the business of embalming, he was not a servant or employé of defendant in any legal sense, and hence that the legal incidents of such a relation did not attach — thereby…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- City Delivery Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- McGeever v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Ex Parte W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Brown v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Berrigan v. . New York, Lake Erie and Western Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Mobile O. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Carraway Methodist Hospital, Inc. v. PittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.