State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon tbe relation of Virginia & Rainy Lake Go. this court issued its writ of certiorari directed to the district court for St. Louis county and to Honorable Bert Fesler, one of the judges thereof, commanding them to return to this .court a transcript of all the records of proceedings in said court in an action wherein Stanley Bashko was plaintiff-employee and the Virginia & Bainy Lake Co. a corporation, was defendant-employer.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The respondent, Bashko, while engaged in getting out ties, poles and posts for the relator, the Virginia & Bainy Lake Co., received an injury which resulted in the loss of the sight of one eye. He made application to the district court of St. Louis county for compensation therefor under the so-called Workmen’s Compensation Act. The court sustained his claim, and adjudged that the company should pay the compensation specified in the act in accordance with the provisions thereof. The company brought the matter before this court by certiorari, and contends that Bashko was not an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waters v. Pioneer Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Barg v. BousfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Rait v. New England Furniture & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Klages v. Gillette-Herzog Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Brown v. Douglas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
3Cited by50 opinions
- Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Dick v. Gravel Logging Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Kelley's Dependents v. Hoosac Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Herron v. Coolsaet Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.