Woodward Iron Co. v. Dean
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The proceedings before us seek a review of the action of the trial court in allowing compensation, as to a common-law widow under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1923, §§ 7534-7597). It is pre seated by way of certiorari with a Kill of exceptions, and by petition for mandamus.
Tbe latter pleading is thus adverted to by counsel for petitioner:
“ * * * To correct his several rulings on the evidence, as pointed .out in the record in this case, and to correct his findings of fact and conclusions on the evidence, and so modify his decree as to conform to the views and opinions ■of the Supreme…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Beggs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Clinton Mining Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hamilton Motor Co. v. CoonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Rogers v. McLeskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Crouse v. StoppsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Warrior Stone & Contracting Co. v. De FoorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Holcombe v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.