Legal Opinion

Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 7, 1937No. 6 Div. 10PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

C. J. Martin filed his complaint in the circuit court of Tuscaloosa county against the Tuscaloosa Veneer Company and others, to recover compensation, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Alabama (Code 1923, § 7534 et seq., as amended), for an accidental injury, which he alleged he received while in the employment of the said defendants, and which injury he alleged he received by reason of an accident arising out of, and in the course of his employment.

Upon the trial of the cause it was agreed in open court by and between counsel for the parties that the only question…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Ex Parte W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Martin v. Republic Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Glen L. Wood v. Holiday Inns, Inc., Interstate Inns, Inc., and Jessie Goynes v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Moore-Handley Hardware Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. American Tennis Courts, Inc. v. HintonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Williams v. Tennessee River Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Weeks v. C.L. Dickert Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API