Legal Opinion

Martin v. Republic Steel Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 12, 1933No. 6 Div. 173PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KbTIGHT, Justice.

Petitioner, Charley Martin, filed his complaint in the court below, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1923, § 7534 et seq.), against the Republic Steel Company, for recovery of compensation for loss of an eye, which petitioner alleges he sustained as the proximate result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment by the defendant.

The defendant, in defense of the suit, filed an answer denying (a) that the petitioner was an employee of the defendant at the time he received the injury, and (b) that proper notice of the accident and -injury had…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Waters v. Pioneer Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Franklin Coal & Coke Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Moore-Handley Hardware Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Meeks v. OPP Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Baggett Transp. Co. v. HolderfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API