Legal Opinion
Williams v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 11, 1992No. CA A64077PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Board of Parole (Board) has petitioned for Supreme Court review of our decision, 107 Or App 515, 812 P2d 443 (1991), in which we held that application of Board rules not in effect when petitioner committed his crime and which had the effect of potentially extending his prison term by 10 months violated the Ex Post Facto Clauses of the Oregon and federal constitutions. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it and adhere to our opinion.
In Williams v. Board of Parole, 98 Or App 716, 780 P2d 793 (1989), rev den 309 Or 522 (1990) (Williams I), we held that an ex post…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ross v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peek v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Jerrold S. Flemming v. Oregon Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Bollinger v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Byrnes v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.