Legal Opinion
Byrnes v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 10, 1995No. CA A82709PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that requires him to serve 36 months of supervised parole pursuant to ORS 144.085 and to remain on parole for life. He argues that application of ORS 144.085 to him violates constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws. We review to determine whether the Board’s decision is in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions. ORS 183.482(8). We reverse and remand for reconsideration.
In 1981, petitioner pleaded guilty to murder, ORS 163.115, and was sentenced to an indeterminate period in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Stuart Jeffrey PaskowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- State v. GallantOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Dietrich v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haskins v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. GodinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Martin v. Kansas Parole BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Thierman v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.