Legal Opinion

Peek v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 28, 1999No. 97C-12445; CA A100853PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*262ARMSTRONG, J.

Plaintiff1 appeals a judgment dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. He asserts that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the Board) failed to follow the applicable statute and administrative rules in extending his parole release date for two years. We reverse.

Many of the arguments that plaintiff raises parallel those that we discussed in Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12, 959 P2d 623 (1998), withdrawn by order July 13, 1998, reasoning reaffirmed and readopted in Merrill v. Johnson, 155 Or App 295, 964 P2d 284, rev den 328 Or 40 (1998),2 and involve the Board’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Meadows v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Harsh Investment Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Housing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Mendieta v. STATE, DIVISION OF STATE LANDSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gilbert C. Brown v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hamel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Mendacino v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Coulter v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API