Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Wakefield

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1949No. Civ. 16916PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, were lessees of the Oxford Hotel in San Pedro, and were owners of the furniture therein. The defendants Wakefield,' who are brother and sister, purchased the lease and furniture from plaintiffs for $28,500; and at the time of the transaction, and in payment of said sum, they paid $5,000 in cash, transferred a $7,500 equity in a ranch in Oregon, and executed a promissory note for $16,000. Defendants Landers, who are husband and wife, were the owners of the hotel, and they consented in writing to the assignment of the lease by plaintiffs to the Wakefields.

Pl…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Swan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mills v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Christiansen v. RoddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. KitchensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Tischhauser v. TischhauserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Fairbairn v. FairbairnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API