Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Pendell

California Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13059PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is an appeal from, an order denying a petition for the removal of executors.

Appellant, the son of the decedent, filed a petition asking the removal of the executors and the appointment of an administrator with the will annexed. As a basis for such request appellant alleged, among other things, that the executors failed to file a projjer inventory of the decedent’s properties; that certain properties were omitted from such inventory; that taxes on some of the properties had not been paid; that there was a failure to rent certain properties ; that the executors neglected to recover certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tucker v. United RailroadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Frascona v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Huntington v. VavraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. In re the Estate of BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Estate of IngramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Stice v. SticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Petroleum Midway Co. v. ZahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API