Legal Opinion

Estate of Claussenius

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1950No. Civ. 17215; Civ. 17216PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Two appeals are presented together. The first (Civ. No. 17215) is from portions of a judgment rejecting certain claims and contentions of Carl Claussenius, surviving husband, herein referred to as ‘‘ Carl ” or “ executor. ’ ’ The second is from an order setting aside a probate homestead for Carl following his controversy with Penrod and Ralph Musser, sons of decedent, herein referred to as “the Mussers.”

The first judgment resulted from the Mussers’ contest of and objections to the first account of executor wherein he claimed that “all the property” described in the inventory was purchased by…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Tassi v. TassiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Estate of NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Ferlito v. CesareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Estate of InmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API