Legal Opinion
Gruenspan v. Seitz
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1997No. 71712PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Patton, Judge.
Plaintiff-attorney Charles Gruenspan brought this libel and tortious-interference-with-judicial-process action against defendant-doctor William H. Seitz, Jr., Seitz’s attorney, Clay Robinson, and Robinson’s law firm, Jacobson, Maynard, Tuschman & Kalur. The allegations of the complaint arose from statements Seitz made in a letter he sent to a ■ common pleas judge hearing a medical malpractice action that plaintiff prosecuted on behalf of a client. Statements in the letter condemned plaintiff’s behavior in scheduling Seitz’s deposition, and also raised criticisms, allegedly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Hoyt, Inc. v. Gordon & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hahn v. KottenOhio Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ferreri v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Guardian Alarm Co. v. PortentosoOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re Estate of IvanchakOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Terrell v. Uniscribe Professional Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Ankle & Foot Care Centers v. Infocure Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.