Legal Opinion

Guardian Alarm Co. v. Portentoso

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 2011No. 13-10-54PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Willamowski, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Nicholas Portentoso, appeals the judgment of the Fostoria Municipal Court ordering him to pay $15,000 to his former employer, plaintiff-appellee, Guardian Alarm Company (“Guardian”), pursuant to the terms of an employment agreement requiring the repayment of excess draws against commissions. On appeal, Portentoso contends that the trial court erred in finding that an enforceable contract existed, that the judgment was against the manifest weight of the evidence, and that the trial court erred in denying his Civ.R. 41(B)(2) motion to dismiss. For…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gruenspan v. SeitzOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. David Johnson v. Keybank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Advance Sign Group, LLC v. Optec Displays, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. Brown v. Lagrange Dev. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Wilhelm v. Coverstone, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Miami County2018
  5. Roberts v. MarksOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API