Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1983No. 82-1424PublishedCited by 641 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The first issue before this court is whether summary judgment was properly granted upon the trial court’s determination that the defendants-appellees’ actions were conducted within the context of a labor dispute.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in characterizing the picketing incident as a labor dispute because neither TAP nor PROD had any labor agreement with BFI. Continuing, appellant argues that the picketing incident was a result of personal animosity against him and not over working conditions. Furthermore, appellant submits that if either the March 1978 or the June 1979…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302 v. AngelosSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by641 opinions

  1. Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Michael F. Hahn and Marie Hahn v. Star BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

636 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API