Legal Opinion

Hahn v. Kotten

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1975No. 74-608PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

This cause is one of first impression before this court.

The trial judge based his decision granting directed verdicts to each of the defendants for the reason that, although some of the statements made by defendants were slanderous per se, the doctrine of qualified privilege applies, and the record failed to demonstrate any evidence of actual malice upon the part of defendants.

I

QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE.

In an action for defamation, the plaintiff’s prima facie case is made out when he has established a publication to a third person for which defendant is responsible, the recipient’s understanding of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Trice v. LancasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. West v. Peoples Banking & Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Johns v. Associated Aviation UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  5. DeAngelo v. W. T. Grant Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Central Ohio Building & Construction Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Jacobs v. FrankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Fawcett v. G. C. Murphy & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API