Legal Opinion

Hoyt, Inc. v. Gordon & Associates, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1995No. 67443PublishedCited by 233 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nugent, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Hoyt, Inc. (“Hoyt”), timely appeals from the decision of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas which granted the motions for summary judgment filed by defendants-appellees, Gordon & Associates, Inc. (“Gordon”) and Consolidated Biscuit Company (“Consolidated Biscuit”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the lower court.

Hoyt initiated the present action through the filing of its complaint on November 12, 1992. In count one, Hoyt alleged that defendant San Joaquin Figs, Inc. (“San Joaquin”), a California corporation engaged in the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by233 opinions

  1. Doe v. Skaggs, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Belmont County2018
  2. Chandler & Associates, Inc. v. America's Healthcare Alliance, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Ament v. Reassure America Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Swallie v. RousenbergOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Allen v. 5125 Peno, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API