Ankle & Foot Care Centers v. Infocure Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On July 23, 2001, Defendants InfoCure Systems, Inc. and DR Software, Inc., (collectively “InfoCure” or the “defendants”), filed a motion for summary judgement on all claims set forth in Plaintiff Ankle & Foot Care Centers’!"Ankle & Foot’s”) amended complaint. 1 (Doc. 34) In deciding this motion, the Court must determine whether genuine issues of material fact exist regarding the plaintiffs eight claims, which involve breach of contract, breach of express and implied warranties, intentional and negligent misrepresentation, detrimental reliance, and unjust enrichment.
Th…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry Barr Sales Agency, Inc. v. All-Lock Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- National Enterprises, Inc. v. Paul SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Weiper v. W.A. Hill & AssociatesOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Terrell v. Uniscribe Professional Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Carcorp, Inc. v. Chesrown Oldsmobile—GMC Truck, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- 1901 Gateway Holdings LLC v. Centimark CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- A.P.M. Technology, Inc. v. Ohio Penal IndustriesOhio Court of Claims · 2010
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Cormetech, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016