Legal Opinion

State v. Umlauf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 1926No. 25,840PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L®bs, C.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of transporting intoxicating liquor, and appealed from the judgment.

Passing by everything else discussed in the brief and argument in defendant’s behalf, we go directly to one point upon which defendant relies, viz: That the state failed to prove that the liquor defendant is charging with having transported was potable as a beverage.

The transportation of intoxicating liquor of any kind in any quantity is prohibited by statute, but the prohibition does not embrace either methyl alcohol or denatured alcohol. Cr. S. 1923, § 3201. The first portion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. State v. TremontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. State v. RuddySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. State v. La DueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. State v. McLeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MiddletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. State v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. State v. GusseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API