Legal Opinion
State v. Ruddy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1924No. 24,172PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Defendant was convicted in the district court of Kandiyohi county of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor as a beverage and appeals from an order denying a new trial.
The defendant was tried upon an information filed by the county attorney charging him with the offense. He contends that the information is faulty because the names of the witnesses examined by the county attorney are not indorsed thereon. That the law does not require nor contemplate that the names of witnesses shall be indorsed upon an information was determined in State v. Workman, 157 Minn. 168, 195 N. W. 776.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HosmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lacklineo v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. La DueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- City of Duluth v. NordinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.