State v. Brown
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant Friend was indicted by tbe grand jury of Marshal I county charged with tbe crime of soliciting and receiving an order for intoxicating liquor; defendant Brown was, indicted for the crime of selling and disposing of the liquor at Warren. Defendants were tried in the district court for that county before G-rindeland, J., and a jury and found guilty as charged in the indictment.
Read the full summary
Defendant Friend was indicted by tbe grand jury of Marshal I county charged with tbe crime of soliciting and receiving an order for intoxicating liquor; defendant Brown was, indicted for the crime of selling and disposing of the liquor at Warren. Defendants were tried in the district court for that county before G-rindeland, J., and a jury and found guilty as charged in the indictment. From orders denying their motions for judgments notwithstanding the verdicts ox- for new trials, both parties appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
Defendant Friend was convicted of the crime of soliciting and receiving an order for intoxicating liquor, to-wit, wine of pepsin, at Warren, Marshall county, Minnesota. Defendant Brown was convicted of the crime of selling and disposing of the same liquor at Warren. Both appeal.
1. It was cleaxiy proved that defendant Friend solicited and received an order for 12 pint bottles o'f wine of pepsin at the time and place charged. It was also pi’oved that wine -of pepsin is essentially sherry wine and contains 22 per cent alcohol, that the ingredient of pepsin is very small and soon becomes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HosmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Ammon v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State v. MuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. MahoneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. NorcrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- State v. RuddySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- The People v. CioppiIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. DennerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.