Legal Opinion

State v. McLean

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1923No. 23,648PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of having in his possession intoxicating liquor for the purpose of transportation, contrary to section 2 of chapter 455, p. 538, Laws 1919, as amended by section 2, chapter 391, p. 590, Laws 1921, and appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial.

The assignments of error present two questions. The first has to do with the manner in which the principal evidence against defendant was obtained.

Incautiously, he left his automobile standing too long one evening on the streets of Pine Eiver. It aroused the curiosity of a passerby to such an extent that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. State v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. State v. MinorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. State v. La DueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. State v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. City of Duluth v. SidenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API