Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1929No. 27,323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Upon an information, duly filed, defendant was convicted of the statutory crime of selling intoxicating liquor, potable as a beverage.

Two detectives, employed by the sheriff of Otter Tail county as investigators and under-cover men, testified that on March 20, 1928, at the village of Dent in said county the defendant sold and delivered to one of them (Franz) a pint bottle of moonshine whisky for $1.50. Both witnesses testified to the circumstances surrounding the sale and that shortly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TremontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. State v. KeehnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Jakula v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. State v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Hallen v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API