State v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Upon an information, duly filed, defendant was convicted of the statutory crime of selling intoxicating liquor, potable as a beverage.
Two detectives, employed by the sheriff of Otter Tail county as investigators and under-cover men, testified that on March 20, 1928, at the village of Dent in said county the defendant sold and delivered to one of them (Franz) a pint bottle of moonshine whisky for $1.50. Both witnesses testified to the circumstances surrounding the sale and that shortly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TremontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State v. KeehnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Jakula v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Hallen v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938