State v. Gussey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CUEIAM.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor potable as a beverage and appeals from an order denying a new trial.
Defendant cites State v. Umlauf, 169 Minn. 422, 211 N. W. 475, holding that the prosecution must prove that the liquor was potable as a beverage, and claims that the prosecution failed to prove that fact in the present case. This is the only point urged against the conviction. Three witnesses who drank or tasted the liquor in question testified that it was moonshine whisky. This was sufficient to justify the jury in finding that it was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State v. TremontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. RuddySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926