Legal Opinion

State v. La Due

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1925No. 24,806PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is from an order denying a new trial to defendant, convicted of a violation of a city ordinance prohibiting the transportation of intoxicating liquor.

Defendant and two others, Baichle and Hiller, were arrested on Hennepin avenue near Thirteenth street in Minneapolis in the afternoon of February 17,1925. They were brought'before the municipal court of Minneapolis the next day upon complaints entered on the court records. The one against defendant, purporting to be made by H. M. Burke, the custodian of persons under arrest by the police, states that “on the 17th day of February,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Cureton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Sebastian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. State v. KollarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. State v. RuddySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clarke v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. State v. DowlingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. State v. TworukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API