Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of S.M.E.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 2007No. A06-330PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, G. Barry, Justice.

S.M.E. seeks review of a decision from the court of appeals holding that his appeal from a district court’s adjudication was untimely. We hold that, in the unusual circumstances of this case, an out-of-time appeal should be granted in the interests of justice. Therefore, we reverse and remand to the court of appeals.

Petitioner S.M.E. was charged on April 14, 2005, with two counts of third-degree criminal sexual conduct involving victims 24 months younger than him. S.M.E. admitted to the second count, which occurred when he was a 17-year-old juvenile, and was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of J.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Marriage of Servin v. ServinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. McFeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Madson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. State v. WollanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In re Welfare of the Child of R.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. State v. BorgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API