Legal Opinion
State v. Green
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 2008No. A06-218PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
In September 2004, appellant Lanny David Green was charged by complaint with second-degree criminal sexual conduct based on a claim that he had touched the genitalia of four-year-old E.Q. in early July 2004 at a picnic at Long Lake in Watonwan County. On the first day of trial, the State was permitted to amend the complaint to add a charge of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. The jury found Green guilty of both offenses, and the court of appeals affirmed. We granted review to consider whether the interests of justice require that Green receive a new trial. Underlying…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- United States v. Robert T. Mitrione and Marla A. DevoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. GatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. HawesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. BorgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.