Legal Opinion

Madson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 2000No. CX-99-1508PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This appeal arises from a lawsuit filed by appellant Catherine Madson against Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) alleging claims of discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Review of the underlying claims is not before this court. We granted review to decide the narrow question of whether appellant’s Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02(a) and (f) motion to vacate judgment was “proper” under Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 104.01, subd. 2 and thus tolled the 60-day time limitation for appeal.

Appellant worked for 3M on and off for 19 years. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Sullivan v. Spot Weld, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Schiltz v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. In Re the Welfare of S.M.E.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Marriage of Huntsman v. HuntsmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Marriage of Mingen v. MingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API