Legal Opinion

State v. Borg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 2013No. A09-1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This appeal by appellant State of Minnesota presents the question of whether the State is entitled to appellate review of an order amending the restitution portion of a sentence when the notice of appeal is filed more than 90 days after entry of the order initially imposing sentence, but within 90 days after the entry of the amended sentencing order. In September 2008, a jury found respondent Brett David Borg guilty of third-degree criminal sexual conduct. The trial court sentenced him to 48 months in prison. As part of the initial sentencing order, the court required…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. GaiovnikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In Re the Welfare of C. W. S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. In Re the Welfare of S.M.E.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harry Jerome Evans v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  2. In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., ChildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State of Minnesota v. Joel Patrick RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  5. State of Minnesota v. Jason Turner JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API