Legal Opinion

Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 2014No. A13-742PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LILLEHAUG, Justice.

We granted review in this case to decide a question of great interest and consequence to parties and their lawyers in civil cases: whether the plausibility standard announced in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009), applies to civil pleadings in Minnesota state court. We conclude that it does not.

I

Laura L. Walsh defaulted on the mortgage on her residential property in Minneapolis. The mortgage holder, U.S. Bank, N.A., commenced a non-judicial…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API