State v. McFee
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether, consistent with United States Supreme Court precedent, juvenile adjudications can be used in calculating a defendant’s criminal history score when the fact of those adjudications has been determined by a judge, not a jury. The Supreme Court has said that, “ ‘[ojther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.’” Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 301, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Welch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- People v. NguyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. OronaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- In Re the Welfare of S.M.E.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.