In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Nefstead
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Justice.
JURISDICTION
This disciplinary proceeding arises out of respondent’s conduct in connection with his representation of the Verde Valley Senior Citizens Club. The Hearing Committee recommended a suspension of twelve months. The Disciplinary Commission recommended disbarment and payment of restitution. Respondent filed a notice of objection to the Commission’s report. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 53(e), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
ISSUES
We must decide:
1. Whether the findings of misconduct are supported by clear and convincing evidence.
2. What discipline…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of WinesArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Matter of ArrickArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of SpearArizona Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MyersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of HenryArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, EnganArizona Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.