Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Henry

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1991No. SB-90-0070-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON, Chief Justice.

JURISDICTION

The Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Commission) recommended that James Cy Henry (respondent) be disbarred from the practice of law in Arizona, make restitution to two former clients, and pay $985.95 in costs to the State Bar of Arizona (Bar). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S.Sup.Ct. Rules, Rule 53(e).

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Bar filed a complaint against respondent on July 31, 1989, charging him with two counts of ethical violations. Count one charged respondent with failure to competently or diligently…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, FresquezArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, GalushaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Matter of CouserArizona Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of WolframArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Non-Member of State Bar, Van DoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re a Disbarred Member of the State Bar of Arizona, HenryArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In the Matter of Carly Van DoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Matter of WolframArizona Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API