In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Jones
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Justice.
The Disciplinary Commission recommended that attorney Philip Jones (Respondent) be disbarred from the practice of law and make restitution to his defrauded client. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S.Sup.Ct.Rules, Rule 53(e).
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A client retained Respondent in connection with the client’s acquisition of some property that had sustained a fire loss covered by insurance. Respondent received the insurance proceeds on behalf of his client, but ignored his client’s directions to pay the proceeds to a third party. Instead, Respondent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, GalushaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, NefsteadArizona Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Non-Member of State Bar, Van DoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re VarbelArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Bowen IIIArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. ApkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- In Re GilesArizona Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.