In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Myers
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
David A. Myers (respondent) appeals from the Disciplinary Commission’s (Commission) recommendation that he be publicly censured for his failure to appear on his client’s behalf at an immigration hearing. We have jurisdiction under Rule 53(e), Ariz. R.Sup.Ct, 17A A.R.S. Respondent argues that he did not violate any provisions of the *559Code of Professional Responsibility1 with which he was charged, so that no discipline is appropriate.
FACTS
On September 9, 1985, the State Bar received a letter from Chief Immigration Judge William R. Robie stating that respondent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of WolframArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. McKechnieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re AlcornArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Weiss v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.