Legal Opinion
Matter of Neville
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1985No. SB-316PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
Respondent Neville was charged with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility Rule 29(a), Rules of the Su preme Court, 17A A.R.S. 1 A formal complaint was filed against respondent on January 28, 1983 in three counts. A hearing was held before State Bar Local Administrative Committee for District 5H (Committee) on May 3 & 4, 1983. The Committee concluded that the violations charged in Counts One and Two were substantiated and recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for ninety (90) days. Respondent objected to the Committee’s original and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. MershonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Matter of WeinerArizona Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.