In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Engan
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
The Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court (Commission) recommended that Thomas Keith Engan (Respondent) be disbarred and ordered to pay restitution to his clients as well as costs and expenses incurred by the State Bar of Arizona (State Bar) in this matter. Respondent did not file a notice of appeal with the Commission, so the matter was submitted to us for review on the record filed by the Commission. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 53(e), Ariz.R.Sup.Ct., 17A A.R.S. (hereinafter Rule _).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 5, 1990, the State Bar…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KerstingArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re LincolnArizona Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. DistelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona RedondoArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona RedondoArizona Supreme Court · 1993