Legal Opinion

In the Interest of PF

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2006No. 20050302PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] P.F. appeals from an order committing him to the care, custody, and control of the executive director of the North Dakota Department of Human Services for treatment as a sexually dangerous individual. On appeal, P.F. argues the district court had insufficient grounds for finding probable cause at the preliminary hearing. Additionally, he argues the final commitment hearing was not timely held and clear and convincing evidence did not exist to show P.F. was a sexually dangerous individual. We conclude probable cause was properly found, a proper extension was granted for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. In the Interest of M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Grosinger v. M.B.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bertsch v. D.V.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. LinghorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Feland v. P.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API