Legal Opinion

Grosinger v. M.B.K.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2002No. 20010108PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] M.B.K. appealed from an order committing him to the care, custody, and control of the executive director of the North Dakota Department of Human Services for treatment as a sexually dangerous person. M.B.K. contends the State failed to establish he was “likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct” as required for commitment by N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-13, and as a result, the evidence was insufficient to sustain the order of commitment. We conclude the district court’s order was sufficiently supported by the evidence. Therefore, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2]…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. In the Interest of M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Westerheide v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. North Dakota Securities Commissioner v. Juran & Moody, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In the Interest of PFNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Bertsch v. D.V.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API