Legal Opinion

Feland v. J.M.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2006No. 20050383PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] J.M. appeals from an October 28, 2005, order committing him as a sexually dangerous person. J.M. argues the trial court erred by not dismissing the petition for commitment on the grounds the commitment hearing was not held within sixty days after the finding of probable cause. He also argues there was not sufficient evidence presented to commit him as a sexually dangerous person. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On December 28, 1998, J.M. pled guilty to corruption of a minor involving a sexual act committed on a minor victim. On August 22, 2001, J.M. pled guilty to gross sexual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Madison v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In the Interest of M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In the Interest of PFNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Care & Treatment of Murrell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In Re AmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In the Matter of AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Griffin v. Loring Reil Sky RushNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API