Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M.D.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1999No. 980250PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] M.D. appeals from an order committing him as a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 1993, M.D. pleaded guilty to gross sexual imposition for engaging in sexual acts with a 14-year-old boy. M.D. was sentenced to serve ten years in prison, with five-and-one-half years suspended. M.D. was also ordered to participate in the sex offender treatment program while incarcerated at the state penitentiary. M.D. twice began the treatment program but did not complete it.

[¶ 3] M.D. was released from the penitentiary in 1996 and placed on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. In Re Commitment of FisherTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API