Legal Opinion
State v. Linghor
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 2004No. 20030360PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Matthew Linghor appealed from a jury conviction for conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance — methamphetamine, a class A felony. Linghor claims evidence discovered during a traffic stop should have been suppressed and that the State’s retrial of his case violated the prohibition against double jeopardy. We affirm Linghor’s conviction.
[¶ 2] Williams County Deputy Sheriff Terry Sherven made a traffic stop of an automobile in which Matthew Linghor was a passenger. Deputy Sherven detected an odor of anhydrous ammonia coming from the automobile and, in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. WoinarowiczNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. AlbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- In the Interest of PFNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Devils Lake v. GroveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. OienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.