Legal Opinion
Feland v. P.F.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 2008No. 20070133PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] P.F. appeals from the district court’s order for commitment and order denying his motion to have a statute declared unconstitutional. P.F. argues N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-17 violates the separation of powers doctrine, and N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3 violates equal protection. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In 2005, the district court ordered P.F.’s commitment as a sexually dangerous individual, and this Court affirmed the or*727der. In the Interest of P.F., 2006 ND 82, 712 N.W.2d 610.
[¶ 3] In May 2006, P.F. petitioned for discharge and requested a hearing on the petition, under N.D.C.C. §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Detention of SamuelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HolbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Bolinske v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Haugland v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.