Legal Opinion

Rice v. Thomasville Chair Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1953No. 668PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The statute, G.S. 97-2 (r), provides:

“In all claims for compensation for hernia or rupture, resulting from injury by accident arising out of and in the course of the employee’s employment, it must be definitely proven to the satisfaction of the Industrial Commission:
“First. That there was an injury resulting in hernia or rupture.
“Second. That the hernia or rupture appeared suddenly.
“Third. That it was accompanied by pain.
“Fourth. That the hernia or rupture immediately followed an accident.
“Fifth. That the hernia or rupture did not exist prior to the accident for which compensation is claimed.”

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Hildebrand v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Hegler v. Cannon Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Moore v. Engineering & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Hildebrand v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. McAninch v. Buncombe County SchoolsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API