Legal Opinion

Hildebrand v. McDowell Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1937PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlabksoN, J.

Tbe question involved: Is there any sufficient competent evidence to support tbe finding of tbe Industrial Commission that tbe death of claimant’s deceased, Wesley Williams, was caused by accident arising out of and in tbe course of bis employment? We think not.

In Conrad v. Foundry Co., 198 N. C., 723, it is written (at p. 725) : “Tbe Workmen’s Compensation Law prescribes conditions under which an employee may receive compensation for personal injury. Section 2 (f) declares that ‘injury and personal injury shall mean only injury by accident arising out of and in tbe course of tbe employment,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Marchiatello v. Lynch Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. Bellamy v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Berry v. Colonial Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Alford v. Quality Chevrolet CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Sandy v. Stackhouse IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API